ai诈骗法律法规

Require that developers of the most powerful AI systems share their safety test results and other critical information with the U.S.government.In accordance with the Defense Production Act,the Order will require that companies developing any foundation model that poses a serious risk to national security,national economic security,or national public health and safety must notify the federal government when training the model,and must share the results of all red-team safety tests.These measures will ensure AI systems are safe,secure,and trustworthy before companies make them public.Develop standards,tools,and tests to help ensure that AI systems are safe,secure,and trustworthy.The National Institute of Standards and Technology will set the rigorous standards for extensive red-team testing to ensure safety before public release.The Department of Homeland Security will apply those standards to critical infrastructure sectors and establish the AI Safety and Security Board.The Departments of Energy and Homeland Security will also address AI systems’ threats to critical infrastructure,as well as chemical,biological,radiological,nuclear,and cybersecurity risks.Together,these are the most significant actions ever taken by any government to advance the field of AI safety.Protect against the risks of using AI to engineer dangerous biological materials by developing strong new standards for biological synthesis screening.Agencies that fund life-science projects will establish these standards as a condition of federal funding,creating powerful incentives to ensure appropriate screening and manage risks potentially made worse by AI.Protect Americans from AI-enabled fraud and deception by establishing standards and best practices for detecting AI-generated content and authenticating official content.The Department of Commerce will develop guidance for content authentication and watermarking to clearly label AI-generated content.Federal agencies will use these tools to make it easy for Americans to know that the communications they receive from their government are authentic—and set an example for the private sector and governments around the world.

However,AI can increase the riskof unfair bias or discrimination across a range of indicators or characteristics.Thiscould undermine public trust in AI.Product safety laws ensure that goods manufactured and placed on the market inthe UK are safe.Product-specific legislation(such as for electrical and electronicequipment,56medicaldevices,57and toys58)may apply to some products thatinclude integrated AI.However,safety risks specific to AI technologies should bemonitored closely.As the capability and adoption of AI increases,it may pose newand substantial risks that are unaddressed by existing rules.Global Innovation Index 2022,GII 2022; Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance,World Bank,2023.Demand for AI skills in jobs,OECD Science,Technology and Industry Working Papers,2021.The protected characteristics are age,disability,gender reassignment,marriage and civil partnership,race,religion orbelief,sex,and sexual orientation.Article 5(1)(a)Principles relating to processing of personal data,HM Government,2016.Electrical Equipment(Safety)Regulations,HM Government,2016.Medical Devices Regulation,HM Government,2002.Toys(Safety)Regulations,HM Government,2011.A pro-innovation approach to AI regulationConsumer rightslaw59may protect consumers where they have entered into asales contract for AI-based products and services.Certain contract terms(forexample,that goods are of satisfactory quality,fit for a particular purpose,and asdescribed)are relevant to consumer contracts.Similarly,businesses are prohibitedfrom including certain terms in consumer contracts.Tort law provides acomplementary regime that may provide redress where a civil wrong has causedharm.It is not yet clear whether consumer rights law will provide the right level ofprotection in the context of products that include integrated AI or services based on

approach to the rule of law,supported by our technology-neutral legislation and regulations.UKlaws,regulators and courts already address some of the emerging risks posed by AItechnologies(see box 2.1 for examples).This strong legal foundation encourages investment innew technologies,enabling AI innovation tothrive,52and high-quality jobs to