帮我找下含义这句类似话的文章，学习ai不是让我们放弃思考

几个月前，我写了一篇关于在决定使用人工智能时应考虑的七件事情的文章。人们经常问：“什么时候可以使用人工智能？”简短的答案是：“这取决于学习任务。”在使用人工智能时，我们不希望机器代替我们进行学习。这就是为什么我们应该从学习任务开始，然后问：“在这种情况下，人工智能是帮助还是阻碍了学习？”这里的核心思想是，我们需要使用学习目标来驱动人工智能，而不是相反。如果你正在教授一门编程课程，你可能希望对学生使用生成型人工智能来创建任何类型的代码进行严格控制。你可能希望学生首先学会手写编码，然后在掌握了语言之后，使用生成的AI代码来节省时间。相比之下，如果你正在教授一门健康课程，学生开发一个应用程序，你可能不在乎他们是否使用生成型人工智能来帮助编写代码。相反，你的重点是帮助学生设计一个基于健康习惯的健康宣传活动。你可能没有时间教学生手写编码。你可能不关心手写编码。这个应用程序只是学生展示对健康标准理解的一种方式。如果你在教艺术课，你可能不想要生成型人工智能生成的图像，但在历史课上，你可能会欢迎学生使用生成型人工智能生成的图像，这样学生就可以制作信息图表来展示他们对宏观经济学原理的理解。在电影课上，学生使用人工智能进行视频编辑可能会被认为是作弊，但在科学课上，人工智能生成的跳跃切割可能会节省大量时间，因为学生可以将重心放在科学内容上。我也要承认，学生学到的一些东西可能会过时。例如，我很确定我实际上并不需要记住州首府。这导致我提出了下一个问题......

Cognitive atrophy happens any time we lose the ability to engage in a mental process due to inactivity.In a world of Artificial Intelligence,we need to be cognizant of the dangers of cognitive atrophy so that we can continue to engage in curiosity,creativity,and deeper learning.If We Off-Load Our Thinking to AI,What About Cognitive Atrophy?When I lived in Phoenix,I had a solid mental layout of the city.I knew which streets were north and south and which were east and west.I knew that Cactus would turn to Shea for some reason when you went to the east side of town.I accidentally memorized the order of our first twenty presidents because of the sequence of presidential street names downtown.I knew where landmarks were located and I would use phrases like,“Where the old Denny’s was located before they moved it up the street” or “Right by where the mall used to be before they turned it into the middle school.”In other words,I learned how to drive in an era where we had to give verbal directions that often shifted from landmark to cardinal direction to left and right and often included a mix of all of the above.I later navigated additional areas of town via MapQuest,which was a bit like being a pirate with a customized map.I often cringe at just how distracted a driver I was as a college student using a printout map to find my way to a friend’s apartment.

This isn’t a new phenomenon.Socrates was concerned about the advent of writing and its impact on memory and knowledge in the “Phaedrus.” Socrates argued that writing would lead to a decline in the mind’s ability to memorize and recall information because people would rely on external written sources instead of internal memory.This reliance on written texts would weaken the mind’s capacity to learn and remember,as individuals would no longer need to exercise their memory to recall information.The truth is,he was right.In a print rich world,modern humanity has lost some of the ability to memorize large chunks of information.As we think about AI,we need to be cognizant of the potential for cognitive atrophy.I love the question and answer nature of a chatbot but I worry about the lack of productive struggle it might cause.I worry about instant answers and the loss of things like boredom and confusion that are so necessary for the learning process.I love how AI can help with ideation but I never want it to be my default in brainstorming.I can see value in using AI throughout the creative process(especially within project-based learning)but I worry about outsourcing creative work to a machine.When that happens,students don’t become the makers and problem-solvers that can be.In other words,I worry that we might become so dependent on AI that we lose the ability to engage in certain types of thinking.Just Because AI Can Do It,Doesn’t Mean We Shouldn’tI have seen many AI experts suggest that we ask the question,“Can AI do this process?” If the answer is “yes,” then it’s time to transform the learning and focus solely on the areas that humans do better.While I get the sentiment here and the need for transformation,I’d like to push back on that.